A Fatally Flawed (but intersting) Read

[Jim Boylston]

Here's another account of the Alamo battle from 1892 that manages to get almost everything wrong. Some of the details (though incorrect) I haven't seen elsewhere, though.
Still, it's yet another report of breakouts from the compound.
Jim
books.google.com/books?id=oUlCnY1SDZwC&pg=PA37&dq=alamo#PPA37,M1

[TRK]

That's some piece of "creative" writing