Alamo Studies Forum
« Alamo Period Military terms »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 16, 2009, 7:00pm




Alamo Studies Forum :: Reference :: Glossary :: Alamo Period Military terms
« Page 2 of 2 Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Alamo Period Military terms (Read 876 times)
trk
Global Moderator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 952
Karma: 9
 Re: Alamo Period Military terms
« Reply #15 on Feb 6, 2008, 6:06pm »

The Spanish terms below are from a cavalry tactics manual, Reglamento para el ejercicio y maniobras de la Caballeria, Tomo I (Filadelfia [Philadelphia]: Se espende en México, en la Libreria de Galvan, Portal de Agustinos, 1836). The manual was originally published in Spain in 1824 but was reprinted in 1836 specifically for the Mexican market:

Anilla: scabbard ring
Atacador: head of a ramrod
Caja: gun stock
Caña: shaft of a ramrod
Cantonera: butt plate (heel plate) of a firearm
Casco: helmet
Cazoleta: fire pan of a flintlock
Cimera: crest of a cavalry helmet
Cola de Caballo: horse tail: specifically, as used to adorn certain cavalry helmets
Crucetta: Iron crosspiece on the spearhead of a lance
Culata: butt of a gun stock
Empuñadura: Saber or sword hilt
Gorra Cilíndrica de piel de oso: Cylindrical bearskin caps, as used by light cavalry
Guarnicion: Saber or sword guard
Moharra: Spearhead of a lance
Pié de Gato: flintlock hammer
Recámara: gun breech
Regatón: Ferrule or base of a lance
Suela: sole leather, specifically as used on line cavalry and dragoon helmets
Tirantes: scabbard slings
Trompetilla: opening in a gun stock for housing the ramrod

« Last Edit: Feb 7, 2008, 8:37am by trk »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
quinceymorris
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 245
Location: North Fork of the Vermilion
Karma: 2
 Re: Alamo Period Military terms
« Reply #16 on Mar 15, 2009, 2:20pm »

Greg-
gastadores were asigned to a battalion. You can find individual soldados listed as gastadores in some battalion returns.

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

The paths of glory led but to the grave...
quinceymorris
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 245
Location: North Fork of the Vermilion
Karma: 2
 Re: Alamo Period Military terms
« Reply #17 on Mar 16, 2009, 8:48pm »


Quote:
Mexican federal government, Decree no. 419, Sept. 1, 1824 (quote:) "Arreglo de la tropa de caballería del ejército. Article 5 (quote): "La plana mayor de cada regimiento, en todos tiempos, constará de un coronel, un teniente coronel mayor, dos comandantes de escuadron, un primer ayudante capitan, dos ayudantes segundos, tenientes, un capellan, un cirujano, un mariscal, dos mancebos, un talabartero, un armero, un clarin mayor, un cabo, y ocho gastadores." [emphasis added]


If you have it, then sorry I brought i up, but would you like to see the 1834 Reglamento on the la plana mayor?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

The paths of glory led but to the grave...
trk
Global Moderator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 952
Karma: 9
 Re: Alamo Period Military terms
« Reply #18 on Mar 17, 2009, 7:14am »

No need to be sorry, and sure, I'd like to see the 1834 Reglamento.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
stuart
Charter Member
*****
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 862
Karma: 5
 Re: Alamo Period Military terms
« Reply #19 on Mar 17, 2009, 7:33am »

"ocho gastadores" would be right; in European armies the pioneers/sapeurs did not form a separate unit as such. Instead one or sometimes two men per company were permanently assigned as such and as the document quoted says, when the battalion was formed up in formal marching order they were included in the "tete de column" (excuse my poor French) along with the musicians and the colour party - they could sometimes serve as the escort for the colours depending on regimental policy

So anyway, with Mexican battalions mustering six fusilier and two preference conmpanies that's where we get the ocho gastadores - one from each company
« Last Edit: Mar 17, 2009, 7:34am by stuart »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Stuart

In battle, men are apt to lose their self possession, and do very absurd things.
quinceymorris
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 245
Location: North Fork of the Vermilion
Karma: 2
 Re: Alamo Period Military terms
« Reply #20 on Mar 17, 2009, 7:35am »

This looks like something that may have been inacted during one of the power struggles, but it seems close: The first section deals with make up of the battalion (eight companies including the granaderos and cazadores) and the second section with the structure of a company (there seems to be nothing new there) . There third section deals with the playa mayor del batalion.

Agusto 12 de 1824
Reglamento provisional para el regimen y govierno del battalion de Defesores de la constitution que va a formaise en esta capital

3. La plana mayor del batalion se compondra de un coronel, un teniente coronel, un primer ayudante, dos segudos ayudantes, dos sub ayudantes, un capillan, un ciujano, un armero, un tambor mayor, un cabo de tambores y pifanos, un cabo y ocho gastadores y doce musicos.

This is out of Recopilcion de Leves.

Now, here is some reality. From the Battalion Permenente Morelos, October 1835 monthly returns found in the Bexar Archives:

1 Coronel
1 Tiente Coronel
1 primero ayudante
1 sub ayudante
1 armero
3 tambor
1 gastadore
1 cabo
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

The paths of glory led but to the grave...
stuart
Charter Member
*****
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 862
Karma: 5
 Re: Alamo Period Military terms
« Reply #21 on Mar 17, 2009, 8:49am »

Interesting, but not in the least surprising.

As I said in my previous post, the gastadores didn't really belong to battalion HQ but were seconded to it from the individual companies.

The likeliest explanation for what was happening in the Morelos Battallon is not that the gastadores were dropping fast, but that as experienced soldiers they were being reclaimed by their parent companies to replace NCO casualties and then not replaced simply because the companies were themselves too depleted to be able to spare men to hang around looking decorative at battalion HQ
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Stuart

In battle, men are apt to lose their self possession, and do very absurd things.
« Page 2 of 2 Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

Google
Webalamostudies.proboards.com
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!