|
|
Post by pawbear on Jan 2, 2010 17:24:49 GMT -5
The General seemed to have been very dependable to Santa Anna but his personal history seems to evaporate after the Battle of San Jacinto. Any opinions of him or knowlege of his later career (or for that matter, his prior history to the winter of 1835)?
Thanks
CW
|
|
|
|
Post by TRK on Jan 2, 2010 18:27:24 GMT -5
Offhand, I recall that Gen. Joaquin Ramirez y Sesma worked again under Santa Anna after the Texas campaign, commanding a brigade at the Battle of Molino del Rey in 1847.
|
|
|
|
Post by pawbear on Jan 2, 2010 18:47:22 GMT -5
Thanks
Being under Santa Anna doesn't seem to be a good guideline for personal ability considering the Generalissmo's own record. In his march with Santa Anna to San Antonio, his ability during the battle and pursuit of Houston, indicates ability. Certainly, being in charge of the army's calvary would mean tactical abilities.
During the Mexican War it would be interesting to know if he showed abilities of his own or just followed instructions strictly.
He seems a bit elusive.
CW
|
|
|
|
Post by martinvasquez on Jan 2, 2010 23:08:15 GMT -5
Well we know Santa Anna was not very happy with Sesma for his delay into Bejar which could have put a quick end to the Alamo story.
Sesma seems to have done a good job of commanding the Mexican cavalry at the perimeter of the Alamo but the tactical advantage of cavalry over men fleeing on foot doesnt really show us much of his leadership skills.
From my readings, during the Texian revolution Sesma was looked at as a strong supporter of Santa Anna and even glorified the tag of Santa Anna being called the "Napoleon of the West"
De La Pena's narrative really bashes Sesma accusing him of being abusive on many different levels and only concerned with lining his pockets while giving the impression he is the model officer.
Martin Vasquez
|
|
